0.3 L’Hôpital’s Rule
Learning Objectives
-
Recognize when to apply L’Hôpital’s rule.
-
Identify indeterminate forms produced by quotients, products, differences, and powers, and apply L’Hôpital’s rule in each case.
-
Describe the relative growth rates of functions.
In this section, we examine a powerful tool for evaluating limits. This tool, known as L’Hôpital’s rule, uses derivatives to calculate limits. With this rule, we will be able to evaluate many limits we have not yet been able to determine. Instead of relying on numerical evidence to conjecture that a limit exists, we will be able to show definitively that a limit exists and to determine its exact value.
Applying L’Hôpital’s Rule
L’Hôpital’s rule can be used to evaluate limits involving the quotient of two functions. Consider
If then
However, what happens if In this case, we have to deal with what’s called the indeterminate form of type
The form is indeterminate because we cannot determine the exact behavior of the quotient
as
approaches
without further analysis.
For example, consider the limits The first limit can be evaluated by factoring the numerator:
As for , one can use a geometric argument to show that
Note that although both limits we just considered exist, in fact, anything is possible for the indeterminate form: the limit might exist and be equal to any real number , the limit might not exist, but there might be a trend of
or
, or there might be no limit and no trend. For example, knowing that
, it is easy to show that
We are going to develop a universal technique for evaluating limits such as the ones above. Not only does it allow for an alternative and sometimes easier way to evaluate these limits, but also, and more importantly, it works for evaluating many other limits that we could not calculate before.
The idea behind L’Hôpital’s rule can be explained using local linear approximations. Consider two differentiable functions and
such that
and
. For
that is very close to
we can write
and
(This follows either from the geometric understanding that the tangent line is very close to the graph around the point where the tangent “touches” the curve or, algebraically, from the formal limit definition of the derivative.)
Therefore,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e47e0/e47e0b13afdd6840913af81568aa9247b5fbdc08" alt="Two functions y = f(x) and y = g(x) are drawn such that they cross at a point above x = a. The linear approximations of these two functions y = f(a) + f’(a)(x – a) and y = g(a) + g’(a)(x – a) are also drawn."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12e99/12e994c62b459e4f6195374b09c7aec25a3c86c3" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \ds\underset{x\to a}{\text{lim}}f(x)=\underset{x\to a}{\text{lim}}g(x),"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9af04/9af0444fe44453f2d5b5c23afd3b7f7b7b572764" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \ds f(x)\text{/}g(x)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/944b8/944b8c0ed1868b1a7c9744b6d746ab9376303b29" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \ds a."
Since is differentiable at
it is continuous at
and therefore
Similarly,
If we also assume that
and
are continuous at
then
and
Using these arguments, we conclude that
Note that the assumptions that and
are continuous at
and
can be loosened. We state L’Hôpital’s rule formally for the indeterminate form
Also note that writing
does not mean we are actually dividing zero by zero. It is just the notation we use when dealing with a limit of a quotient with both numerator and denominator approaching zero.
L’Hôpital’s Rule (
Case)
Suppose and
are differentiable functions over an open interval containing
except possibly at
If
and
then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0440/f044099adb1acb213ac27c4d83f7985b502a955e" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \ds\,\underset{x\to a}{\text{lim}}\,\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=\underset{x\to a}{\text{lim}}\,\frac{{f}^{\prime }(x)}{{g}^{\prime }(x)},"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3930a/3930ab45a21e139b767114838c49d606561ffd29" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \ds\,\infty"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0753d/0753dc278ee969696bec5d3457ded9d339826190" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \ds\,-\infty ."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1338d/1338d947c240f6c8765a638412a9e4f3dd219637" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com a"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f207/9f207a4f1f0dc942deca0d33e8dec6a135e47a36" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \ds\,\infty \text{ or }-\infty ."
Proof
We provide a proof of this theorem in the special case when and
are all continuous over an open interval containing
In this case, since
and
and
are continuous at
we have that
Therefore,
Note that L’Hôpital’s rule allows to calculate the limit of a quotient by considering the limit of the quotient of the derivatives
It is important to realize that we are not calculating the derivative of the quotient
Applying L’Hôpital’s Rule (
Case)
Evaluate each of the following limits using L’Hôpital’s rule.
Solution
-
Since the numerator
approaches
and the denominator
approaches 0 when
, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate this limit. We have
-
As
and
Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. We obtain
-
When
we have that
, that is, the denominator approaches 0, and the numerator
approaches
. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. We obtain
-
As
both numerator and denominator approach zero:
and
. Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. We obtain
Since numerator and denominator of this new quotient both approach 0 as
and
, we apply L’Hôpital’s rule again. In doing so, we see that
Therefore, we conclude that
Evaluate
Answer
-1
We can also use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate limits of quotients in which
and
Limits of this form are classified as indeterminate forms of type
Again, note that we are not actually dividing
by
Since
is not a real number, that is impossible; rather,
is the notation we use when dealing with a limit of a quotient with both numerator and denominator having an infinite trend of
or
.
L’Hôpital’s Rule (
Case)
Suppose that and
are differentiable functions over an open interval containing
except possibly at
Further suppose that
and
Then,
provided that the limit on the right exists or has a trend of
or
This result also holds for one-sided limits or if the finite number
is replaced with
or
Applying L’Hôpital’s Rule (
Case)
Evaluate each of the following limits using L’Hôpital’s rule.
Solution
-
Since
and
are first-degree polynomials with positive leading coefficients,
and
Therefore, we apply L’Hôpital’s rule and obtain
Note that this limit can also be calculated without invoking L’Hôpital’s rule, by dividing the numerator and denominator by the highest power of
in the denominator:
L’Hôpital’s rule provides us with an alternative means of evaluating limits of this type.
-
Here,
and
Therefore, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule and obtain
Now, as
Therefore, the first term in the denominator is approaching zero and the second term is getting really large. In this case, anything can happen to the product, and we cannot make any conclusion yet. (Actually, this is an indeterminate form
that will be discussed a bit later.) To evaluate the limit, we use the relation of
to rewrite the quotient under the limit:
Now,
and
so we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule again:
We conclude that
Evaluate
Answer
0
As was already mentioned, L’Hôpital’s rule is an extremely useful tool for evaluating limits. It is important to remember, however, that to apply L’Hôpital’s rule to a quotient it is essential that the limit of
be of the form
or
This will be illustrated in the example below.
When L’Hôpital’s Rule Does Not Apply
Consider Show that the limit cannot be evaluated by applying L’Hôpital’s rule.
Solution
Because the limits of the numerator and denominator are not both zero and are not both infinite, we cannot apply L’Hôpital’s rule. If we tried to do so, we would have erroneously concluded that
However, since and
using the arithmetic properties of limits, we actually have that
and so that
Another, trickier, case when L’Hôpital’s rule cannot be applied is when the limit of the quotient obtained after differentiation does not exist. Indeed, if we carefully read the statements of the L’Hôpital’s rule theorems, we can notice that they both say “provided that the limit on the right exists”. We explore the situation when this condition fails in the next example.
When L’Hôpital’s Rule Does Not Apply
Consider Show that the limit cannot be evaluated by applying L’Hôpital’s rule.
Solution
Both numerator and denominator approach infinity. Thus it appears that we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. If we tried to do so, we would have erroneously concluded that
However, since neither exists, nor is infinite, L’Hôpital’s rule does not actually apply.
Note that this does not mean that the original limit fails to exist. Because , when
, we have that
. Now since
(that can be proved using L’Hôpital’s rule), we can use the squeeze theorem to conclude that
Explain why we cannot apply L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate Evaluate
by other means.
Answer
Other Indeterminate Forms
We have seen that L’Hôpital’s rule is very useful for dealing with the indeterminate forms and
. It can also help to evaluate limits involving other indeterminate forms such as
,
,
,
, and
. As before, these expressions should be treated not as algebraic operations but as the notation reflecting the behavior of the function under the limit. We show why they are indeterminate forms and how to use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate the corresponding limits. The key idea is to rewrite the expression as a quotient of the form
or
.
Indeterminate Form of Type data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/878dc/878dc752b3965c47c0f127f46a8b18e2018d8182" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com 0\cdot\infty"
Suppose we want to evaluate , where
and
as
. Since one term in the product is approaching zero but the other term is becoming arbitrarily large in magnitude, anything can happen to the product. We use the notation
to denote the form that arises in this situation. The expression
is considered indeterminate because, without further analysis, we cannot determine the exact behavior of the product
as
.
For example, let n be a positive integer and consider . As
,
and
. However, the limit of
as
varies, depending on
. Indeed,
if , then
,
if , then
,
and if , then
. (All these limits can be evaluated by either dividing both numerator and denominator by the highest power of
in the denominator or by using L’Hôpital’s rule, multiple times, when needed).
We now consider another limit involving the indeterminate form and show how to rewrite the function as a quotient to use L’Hôpital’s rule.
Indeterminate Form of Type data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b819/5b8192db7c5a5cb8aca9ccba75d9b39d6f943f30" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com 0\cdot\infty"
Evaluate
Solution
To be able to use L’Hôpital’s rule, we rewrite the function as a quotient in the following way:
. Since
as
and
as
, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule to obtain
We conclude that
In general, one of the ways to transform a product of functions into a quotient is to use double reciprocals, that is, rewrite
as
or
.
Evaluate
Answer
1
Indeterminate Form of Type data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba18f/ba18f784500996d519ccc39fe1a734bc68ebeb52" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \infty -\infty"
Suppose that (or
). Then the limit
represents an indeterminate form
.
To show that this is, indeed, an indeterminate form, and the answer could be anything, consider the following example. Let be a positive integer,
and
. As
,
and
, but
depends on the value of the exponent
. To see this, we recall that, when
, the behavior of a polynomial
is determined by the leading term
since
and
for any
.
Therefore, if , then
.
On the other hand, if , then
.
Finally, if , then
.
In the next example, we show how to rewrite an expression involving the indeterminate form as a fraction in order to apply L’Hôpital’s rule.
Indeterminate Form of Type data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de8b3/de8b3f3abc8cb2642888821fd1bd1ce2001f5b04" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \infty -\infty"
Evaluate
Solution
Bringing the expression to a common denominator, we obtain
Since and
, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule.
We have that and
Because the denominator is positive as
approaches zero from the right, we conclude that
Therefore,
In general, bringing the difference of fractions to a common denominator often works to reduce an indeterminate form to
or
form, after which L’Hôpital’s rule can be applied.
Evaluate
Answer
0
Hint
Rewrite the difference of fractions as a single fraction.
Another types of indeterminate forms that arise when evaluating limits involve exponents. The expressions
and
are all indeterminate forms. Again, these expressions are not meant to be evaluated using algebraic operations, rather they provide a notation used to describe the behavior of a function under the limit. We now demonstrate how L’Hôpital’s rule can be used to evaluate limits involving these indeterminate forms.
Suppose we want to evaluate and we arrive at one of the indeterminate forms listed above. We proceed as follows. Let
Then,
and we first evaluate
. This allows to reduce an indeterminate power to an indeterminate product. Indeed,
corresponds to
,
corresponds to
, and
corresponds to
. We then use the techniques discussed earlier to rewrite the expression
as a quotient so that we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule. Suppose that
where
may be
or
So we have that
and since the natural logarithm function is continuous, we conclude that
It follows that
Indeterminate Form of Type data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf480/cf48073640c2acd01eace278b26c3ff3925ca524" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com {\infty }^{0}"
Evaluate
Solution
Let Then
We first need to evaluate Since both numerator and denominator approach infinity as
, we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule to obtain
So we have that and since the natural logarithm function is continuous, we conclude that
This leads to
Evaluate
Answer
Hint
Take and consider
.
Indeterminate Form of Type data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d998/6d9989b784d8938dcfb144f2d9473eafd1960184" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com {0}^{0}"
Evaluate
Solution
Let Then
We now evaluate Since
and
we have the indeterminate form
To apply L’Hôpital’s rule, we need to rewrite
as a fraction. We could write
or
Let’s consider the first option. In this case, applying L’Hôpital’s rule, we would obtain
Unfortunately, we not only have another expression involving the indeterminate form but the new limit is even more complicated to evaluate than the one we started with. Instead, we try the second option. By writing
and applying L’Hôpital’s rule, we obtain
Using the fact that and
we can rewrite the last limit as
Because , we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule again to get
We conclude that Using the continuity of logarithmic function, we obtain that
, and hence
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa29d/aa29d4abcbee837ec81c8eded03fe69868d76586" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \underset{x\to {0}^{+}}{\text{lim}}{x}^{ \sin (x)}=\underset{x\to {0}^{+}}{\text{lim}}y=e^{\text{ln}(\underset{x\to {0}^{+}}{\text{lim}}y)}={e}^{0}=1."
Evaluate
Answer
1
Hint
Take and consider
.
Growth Rates of Functions
Suppose the functions and
both approach infinity as
Although the values of both functions become arbitrarily large as the values of
become sufficiently large, sometimes one function is growing more quickly than the other. For example,
and
both approach infinity as
However, as shown in the following table, the values of
are growing much faster than the values of
![]() |
10 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 |
![]() |
100 | 10,000 | 1,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
![]() |
1000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000,000 | ![]() |
In fact,
As a result, we say is growing more rapidly than
as
On the other hand, for
and
although the values of
are always greater than the values of
for
each value of
is roughly three times the corresponding value of
as
as shown in the following table. In fact,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/910b0/910b0d46d5ad687bbc82f30c95a9de2cf5c6d447" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \underset{x\to \infty }{\text{lim}}\ds\,\frac{{x}^{2}}{3{x}^{2}+4x+1}=\ds\,\frac{1}{3}."
![]() |
10 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 |
![]() |
100 | 10,000 | 1,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
![]() |
341 | 30,401 | 3,004,001 | 300,040,001 |
In this case, we say that and
are growing at the same rate as
More generally, suppose and
are two functions that approach infinity as
We say
grows more rapidly than
as
if
On the other hand, if there exist constants and a number
such that
, for all
, we say that
and
grow at the same rate as
.
Next we see how to use L’Hôpital’s rule to compare the growth rates of power, exponential, and logarithmic functions.
Comparing the Growth Rates of
and data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd981/bd9814840dc5d2dbc9552a92187592a77dc73d80" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \large{{e}^{x}}"
For each of the following pairs of functions, use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate
Solution
-
Since
and
we can use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate
We obtain
Because
and
we can apply L’Hôpital’s rule again:
Hence,
, which means that
grows more rapidly than
as
(see the figure with the graphs of these functions below).
Figure 3. An exponential function grows at a faster rate than a power function. Growth rates of a power function and an exponential function. 5 10 15 20 25 100 225 400 148 22,026 3,269,017 485,165,195 -
Since
and
we can use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate
We obtain
Thus,
grows more rapidly than
as
, which agrees with the following figure displaying the graphs of these functions.
Figure 4. A power function grows at a faster rate than a logarithmic function. Growth rates of a power function and a logarithmic function 10 100 1000 10,000 2.303 4.605 6.908 9.210 100 10,000 1,000,000 100,000,000
Compare the growth rates of and
Answer
The function grows faster than
Hint
Apply L’Hôpital’s rule sufficiently many times to evaluate
Using the same ideas as in example (a) above, it is not difficult to show that grows more rapidly than
for any
In the following table, we compare
with
and
as
becomes large.
![]() |
5 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
![]() |
125 | 1000 | 3375 | 8000 |
![]() |
625 | 10,000 | 50,625 | 160,000 |
![]() |
148 | 22,026 | 3,269,017 | 485,165,195 |
Similarly, it is also easy to show that grows more rapidly than
for any
In the table below, we compare
with
and
when
becomes large.
![]() |
10 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 |
![]() |
2.303 | 4.605 | 6.908 | 9.210 |
![]() |
2.154 | 4.642 | 10 | 21.544 |
![]() |
3.162 | 10 | 31.623 | 100 |
Key Concepts
-
L’Hôpital’s rule can be used to evaluate the limit of a quotient when the indeterminate form
or
arises.
-
L’Hôpital’s rule can also be applied to other indeterminate forms if the expressions under the limit can be rewritten as a quotient of indeterminate form
or
-
The exponential function
grows faster than any power function
-
The logarithmic function
grows slower than any power function
Exercises
For the following exercises, evaluate the given limit. If the limit does not exist, indicate whether there is a trend of or
. In case you are using L’Hôpital’s rule, explain why it applies.
1.
Answer
2.
3.
Answer
4.
5.
Answer
6.
7.
Answer
-2
8.
9.
Answer
10.
11.
Answer
12.
13
Answer
14.
15.
Answer
16. , where
is a fixed real number and
is a positive integer.
17.
Answer
18.
19.
Answer
20.
21.
Answer
22.
23.
Answer
24.
25.
Answer
1
26.
27.
Answer
0
28.
29.
Answer
30.
31.
Answer
32.
33.
Answer
1
34.
35.
Answer
36.
37.
Answer
38.
39.
Answer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae5b8/ae5b8d3f48ec8eccf2498c14a80f6b393e8b52e7" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \underset{x\to 0^+}{\text{lim}}{\big(\cos(x)\big)^{\sin^{-1}(x)}"
41.
Answer
1
42.
43.
Answer
44.
45.
(Hint: Factor out of the expression.)
Answer
Glossary
- indeterminate forms
- when evaluating a limit, the forms
and
are considered indeterminate because further analysis is required to determine whether the limit exists and, if so, what its value is
- L’Hôpital’s rule
- if
and
are differentiable functions over an open interval that contains
except possibly at
and
or
and
are infinite, then
provided the limit on the right exists or has a trend of
or
Hint
Determine the limits of the numerator and denominator and analyze the behavior of the quotient.