Main Body
6 Ethical Considerations of Generating Synthetic Images
A.V. Ronquillo
Ethical Concerns with Modelling in Blender
Ethical considerations in the synthesis of images using Blender are crucial. This method of image generation involves creating synthetic animals within synthetic backgrounds, which requires careful consideration of the environmental context and potential implications involved. Given that this method operates within a highly controlled modelling environment, the principles of realism and accurate animal behaviour remain paramount. Because there is a great deal of agency and control involved in 3D modelling, there is also a high magnitude of responsibility in ensuring that synthetic representations do not perpetuate harmful stereotypes or erroneous depictions of wildlife. The simulation of natural animal movements and habitats must be conducted with respect and responsibility to avoid producing distressing or misleading interpretations of animal behaviour or animal interactions. With a good selection of data collection technology, data can be collected in a minimally invasive way regarding interference in the ecosystem, therefore risks related to environmental security related to data collection can be minimized.[1] Therefore, generating synthetic images includes a great deal of responsibility which is why it is important that its ethical factors are considered because this strategy can be quite powerful when it comes to not just improving model generalization, but also minimizing invasive environmental data collection.
Maintaining high standards of realism is vital, as accuracy is critical for training classification models with these images.[2] Inaccurate representations can introduce biases that negatively affect model performance.[3] Moreover, within this broad scope of accuracy, ensuring diversity and inclusivity within synthetic data is important to prevent disparities and existing inequalities in wildlife research.[4] Additionally, respect for data privacy and upholding principles of fairness, accountability, and transparency in research are essential for maintaining ethical standards in synthetic image generation.[5]
Actions to Take
Ensure Realistic and Accurate Representations:
Maintain high standards of realism in synthetic animal models to prevent the introduction of biases to avoid poor model performance. Its important to base animal behaviors, movements, and physical characteristics on scientifically accurate data and observations.
Respect Wildlife Context and Behaviour:
Simulate natural animal movements and habitat interactions with careful attention to authentic behavioural patterns. Avoid creating synthetic scenarios that could perpetuate harmful stereotypes about wildlife.
Promote Diversity and Inclusivity:
Ensure synthetic datasets include diverse representations of wildlife species, environments, and ecological contexts to prevent disparities and address existing inequalities in wildlife research.
Maintain Environmental Responsibility:
Leverage the controlled nature of 3D modelling to minimize the need for invasive environmental data collection. Synthetic image generation can be proposed as a tool to reduce ecological disturbance while still advancing wildlife conservation research.
Notes
- Branko Marković, Drago Nedić, and Savo Minić, "ICT Systems for Monitoring and Protection of Wildlife in Their Natural Environment," *Veterinarski Journal Republike Srpske* 18, no. 1 (2018): 176, https://doi.org/10.7251/VETJEN1801132M. ↵
- O. Sahlgren, "Action-Guidance and AI Ethics: The Case of Fair Machine Learning," *AI Ethics* (2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00437-2. ↵
- Beery et al., "Synthetic Examples Improve Generalization." ↵
- Shooter, Malleson, and Hilton, "SyDog-Video." ↵
- O. Bendel, "Image Synthesis from an Ethical Perspective," *AI & Society* (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01780-4.ynt. ↵